If you have ever lost a weekend to a stack of documents, hunting for one critical clause, you may already know why artificial intelligence is finding a home among real property lawyers. Unsurprisingly to those practicing, real property is not the practice area you would expect to be early to anything technologically advanced. This is not intended to offend practitioners in this area, as there are still several counties in Texas that don’t allow e-recording, and we deal with a lot of old documents.
A single acquisition can bury you under hundreds of leases, estoppels, surveys, title commitments, and ser vice contracts, and somewhere in that pile is one detail that blows up the deal. AI tools can now read an entire data room, pull the key terms into a single summary, and flag the incon sistencies you would have eventually caught yourself, just three days sooner. We are all reading the headlines, and many people have vowed to never use AI in their legal practice. Some of those people are unlikely to change their minds. Others are now famil iarizing themselves with the types of tools available and spending the time to understand and integrate them into their practices. Based on how quickly things are moving, some people read ing this likely see the topics covered here as outdated, while others may be completely unfamiliar with how many of their colleagues are using AI in their practice on a daily basis.
While there is no crystal ball, a lot has changed and is changing in the legal industry: major firm announce ments of multimillion dollar invest ments into customized tools, small firms and solo practitioners utilizing tools across their practices to minimize the administrative burden, and every thing in between. The learning curve is significant, and new attorney and non-attorney roles are popping up as everyone works to determine whether they will adapt, and if so how. So, for those who are curious about what is happening at the attorney level, let’s get into it.
The beauty of AI tools is that they are just like someone you may work with today: they make mistakes and they need clear instructions to deliver what you have requested. For a trans actional attorney, a well-prompted tool can hand you a first draft, or take a counterparty’s redline against your form and tell you exactly what changed. Litigators get their share, too. Real property disputes generate signifi cant documentation, and tools abound to aid in discovery review, managing and organizing large document sets, summarizing depositions, and assem bling the raw material for a brief.
You are probably wondering who is actually doing this outside of the mas sive firms in the headlines, and the answer may surprise you. Solos and small firms have been some of the ear liest adopters, likely because when you are your own back office, the lever age is next to impossible to ignore. As you can imagine, some larger firms move slower, and not because they are behind. They are working through security, client confidentiality, and implementation across departments and offices. In-house teams, pressured to do more with the same headcount, are also leading the charge, and many expect their outside counsel to keep up.
The learning curve goes beyond simply how to use the tools. Lawyers are used to tools made for the specific nature of legal practice, but many AI tools out there are not made specifi cally for legal work, yet attorneys and clients are using them for that purpose regardless. Key issues revolve around keeping client information out of con sumer tools that may train on whatever information you feed them, and ensur ing the work is on a platform built for law, with real data protection. On the other side of that issue, attorneys must question and verify everything, because these tools can be confidently wrong. Just like people!
Where things stand today, the con versations keep coming back to the fact that none of this replaces the real prop erty lawyer. The judgment, the negoti ation, the read on a difficult counter party, the trust a client holds in you to know them and their priorities—all of that remains. Whether you are involved or not, the change is already underway. Overwhelmingly, the lawyers who have decided to get on board are firm that they would never go back.
To read more, click here.